App.net - would you pay?by peter.griffin
The start-up launched in a blaze of glory last week promising to build a platform that would spawn numerous mini social networks based on the needs of users and would be advertising-free. The catch - users have to pay US$50 to sign up, developers US$100. Still, App.net, on the back of endorsements from Silicon Valley luminaries, has raised $800,000, well beyond the $500,000 its founders deemed necessary to make the venture viable.
But is it likely to take off, a minnow going up against free ad-supported networks Facebook and Google+? Is Simon, who has signed up with App.net, wasting his money?
To see what people think, I started a conversation on Branch, another start-up on the scene, which is created by two of the people behind Twitter. Drop me an invite if you want to join the discussion below - we'd love to hear what you think about paid-for social networking.
Fears of rent rises saw a plan to boost to the accommodation supplement shelved two years ago. But it's been resurrected.Read more
A 19-year-old woman is left for dead in Dome valley.Read more
Athena Drummond hates the term “junior doctor”. It implies she is inexperienced, with “limited responsibility”. We think she has a point.Read more
The only times Trump’s presidency has not depressed me are those occasions when I have thought I was reading satire and laughed at its cleverness.Read more
Best-known for her film Bend it Like Beckham, Chadha has focused on the mass displacement that happened when the British abandoned India.Read more
With users and recipes by the millions, it's not surprising what social media can do.Read more