App.net - would you pay?by peter.griffin
The start-up launched in a blaze of glory last week promising to build a platform that would spawn numerous mini social networks based on the needs of users and would be advertising-free. The catch - users have to pay US$50 to sign up, developers US$100. Still, App.net, on the back of endorsements from Silicon Valley luminaries, has raised $800,000, well beyond the $500,000 its founders deemed necessary to make the venture viable.
But is it likely to take off, a minnow going up against free ad-supported networks Facebook and Google+? Is Simon, who has signed up with App.net, wasting his money?
To see what people think, I started a conversation on Branch, another start-up on the scene, which is created by two of the people behind Twitter. Drop me an invite if you want to join the discussion below - we'd love to hear what you think about paid-for social networking.
The sport was bruised by the fallout from the 1981 Springbok tour, the rebel Cavaliers’ visit to South Africa and a rampant rival football code.Read more
Two Auckland high-rises have the same cladding as that of Grenfell Tower, but the Council won't say which ones.Read more
Pauline Hanson claims kids with disabilities should learn in special classrooms. Is she right? Two experts examine the evidence.Read more
Senior members of the National Party are confident this weekend's annual conference won't be overshadowed by the controversy around Todd Barclay.Read more
The marae housing Labour's interns isn't substandard, Trust bosses say, while local Māori say they've been fighting to access it for years.Read more
The Todd Barclay debacle says more about PM Bill English than the tyro MP.Read more