Can red meat cause cancer?

by Jennifer Bowden / 10 November, 2012
As the two sides argue over whether red meat can cause cancer, what should you do?
Can red mead cause cancer?

Barbecue season has arrived and all around the nation home cooks are moving outdoors to socialise with friends and family. But shouldn’t we feel nervous about slapping a big beef steak on the barbecue? After all, the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) recommends we limit our red meat intake to reduce cancer risk, specifically colorectal cancer. Fiona Carruthers, Beef and Lamb New Zealand’s nutrition manager, doesn’t buy into the WCRF recommendation. “We’ve always been surprised by the WCRF’s conclusions as we don’t believe the available scientific evidence supports them.”

Carruthers says the work of researchers such as US-based epidemiologist Dominik Alexander is helping us better understand the links between lifestyle and cancer risk. “What has remained clear throughout is the involvement of obesity and a lack of physical activity as the key factors in the increased risk of many cancers.” Alexander co-authored a review last year in the European Journal of Cancer Prevention that questioned the evidence linking red meat to colorectal cancer. His research team analysed 25 studies and found that people who ate the most red meat had a 12% greater risk of the disease. When they looked at the data by gender, men had a 21% greater risk and women just 1% more. But although researchers have explored gender differences in diet, hormones and biology, they haven’t found a plausible explanation for a gender-based risk difference.

What is certain is people who eat a lot of red meat tend to be heavier and have bad habits. They’re also likely to smoke, drink too much alcohol, not exercise enough, have a low fruit and vegetable intake and be comparatively poor – all factors that increase colorectal cancer risk. Given the small effect, unexplained variations in study findings and possible confounding by other dietary and lifestyle factors, Alexander wasn’t prepared to link red meat consumption with increased risk of the cancer. However, the WCRF’s 2011 update on diet and lifestyle factors associated with colorectal cancer says there is a 17% increase in risk per 100g of red meat eaten a day, down from the 29% risk it calculated in 2005.

It says that given existing evidence of a relationship between the amount consumed and the body’s response, and plausible explanations for how red meat may cause biological changes that increase cancer risk, it remained convinced it is a cause of the disease. So, how can two parties have such divergent opinions on similar data? The criteria used for proving cause and effect are only a set of guidelines and not definitive, so they’re open to interpretation, says Rod Jackson, an epidemiologist at the University of Auckland. Different reviewers are free to emphasise different criteria. “When the effects of a risk factor are relatively weak, as they are with red meat and colorectal cancer, it’s common for there to be conflicting interpretations.”

Alexander’s review was funded by a consortium from the US beef and pork industry. “There’s evidence from systematic reviews that industry-funded studies and reviews are more likely to present findings that support their products than equivalent studies and reviews that aren’t industry-funded,” Jackson says. Still, Alexander isn’t the only epidemiologist to publicly question the WCRF’s red meat conclusions. Jackson says the risk reported by both Alexander and the WCRF can’t be considered definitive when based on observational studies, as opposed to randomised trials, because it could be a spurious relationship.

“In my opinion the evidence isn’t definitive but it appears the WCRF has taken a ‘first do no harm to consumers’ approach, and given the evidence is suggestive of harm, it has wanted to warn people about this. In contrast Alexander appears to have taken the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ approach, or perhaps ‘first do no harm to industry’ approach.” The cautious approach would be to stick to the WCRF recommendation of eating no more than 500g of cooked red meat (700-750g raw weight) a week. That means beef, lamb or pork can safely be enjoyed three to four times a week alongside plenty of fresh salads this summer.
MostReadArticlesCollectionWidget - Most Read - Used in articles
AdvertModule - Advert - M-Rec / Halfpage


Artist Judy Millar creates a show-stopper at Auckland Art Gallery
77134 2017-07-28 08:53:07Z Arts

Artist Judy Millar creates a show-stopper at Auckl…

by India Hendrikse

A brand-new, puzzle-like artwork by Judy Millar at Auckland Art Gallery exuberantly fills a tough space.

Read more
Cat control and 'barking consultants': Is the council coming after your pet?
76916 2017-07-28 00:00:00Z Politics

Cat control and 'barking consultants': Is the coun…

by Bill Ralston

Councils must be barking mad to be considering spending millions more controlling cats and silencing dogs.

Read more
Filmmaker Raoul Peck: Karl Marx, James Baldwin and me
76930 2017-07-28 00:00:00Z Movies

Filmmaker Raoul Peck: Karl Marx, James Baldwin and…

by Helen Barlow

A film-maker focuses on two thinkers who questioned the social order of their day.

Read more
PayWave's great, but we're light years behind China's payment methods
76945 2017-07-28 00:00:00Z Technology

PayWave's great, but we're light years behind Chin…

by Sophie Boot

New Zealand is in the dark ages compared with China’s electronic payment methods and we need to upgrade if we want more of that country’s business.

Read more
Ain’t No Taco: Symonds Street gets a new taqueria with a twist
77130 2017-07-27 14:58:01Z Auckland Eats

Ain’t No Taco: Symonds Street gets a new taqueria …

by Kate Richards

Peter Barton, co-owner of Burger Geek, opens a taqueria a few doors down the road

Read more
Synthetic cannabis: The killer high
77113 2017-07-27 11:56:15Z Social issues

Synthetic cannabis: The killer high

by Susan Strongman

There have been eight deaths related to synthetic cannabis in just over a month. People know it's killing them. So why are they smoking it?

Read more
Winston Peters criticises use of te reo in Parliament
77102 2017-07-27 10:34:33Z Politics

Winston Peters criticises use of te reo in Parliam…

by RNZ

New Zealand First leader Winston Peters has criticised Te Ururoa Flavell for using te reo Māori in Parliament during question time.

Read more
NZ has done 'horrific job' protecting most vulnerable - commissioner
77095 2017-07-27 10:06:22Z Social issues

NZ has done 'horrific job' protecting most vulnera…

by Emile Donovan

Abuse of intellectually disabled people in state care over five decades has been brought to light in a new report by the Human Rights Commission.

Read more