Marriage equality bill: the closet liberals

by Toby Manhire / 30 August, 2012
Jane Clifton on the 11 MPs that swung from opposing civil unions a few years ago to backing same-sex marriage last night.
Now here’s a puzzle. Why, having just a couple of years ago voted against civil unions, would 11 MPs have last night decided to go the whole hog and support full marriage for same-sex couples?

It would be nice to think, from a kindly, liberal perspective, that they have overcome their reservations and concluded that civilisation was not after all imperilled by giving non-heterosexual folk the ability to formalise their commitment. That, perhaps like John Banks, they have since been on a journey toward inclusiveness and understanding.

However, it’s just as likely they are doing the customary bet-hedging thing you get with a lot of private members’ bills: you support the bill going to a select committee, but reserve judgement in the meantime.

This is both a tactful and a time-buying avenue for parliament, seen again only last night with Green MP Catherine Delahunty’s bill to protect a river. MPs decided on balance they didn’t want to dump on the nice, harmless, green bill – which would have been the parliamentary equivalent of bashing a teddy bear - so sent it for a good talking-over at the select committee. But in the end it’s highly unlikely parliament will agree to tackle conservation one river at a time.

For the record, the MPs who said no to civil unions but at least a provisional yes to full gay marriage were: John Key, Judith Collins, Lockwood Smith, Maurice Williamson, Murray McCully, Paul Hutchison, Gerry Brownlee, David Carter, Clayton Cosgrove, Tariana Turia and Peter Dunne.

And, no: knowing these individuals, it is highly unlikely that they voted against civil unions because at the time they thought it didn’t go far enough.

Time will tell whether they have had a change of heart about the robustness and inclusiveness of the institution of marriage, or are just keeping their power dry. It’s also possible some have had the living daylights successfully lobbied out of them by the pro-equality lobby. And, again, knowing these individuals, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if at least a couple are voting yes for the ornery reason that they did not appreciate the character of lobbying by the anti-equality brigade.

In any event, it is very possible that, while the bill appears to have a handsome safety margin, it will eventually become law with a lower vote than it had for its introduction.

The other lingering question surrounds Banks, who did not speak to the bill’s introduction. He has been maddeningly inscrutable as to his reasons for supporting the introduction. Call us picky, but we in the press gallery did not find “Cos I am” a particularly useful existential positioning statement.

There are three possibilities here. One is that Banks, like the 11 aforementioned, is simply letting the big select committee talkfest go ahead, but reserving the right to vote no in the end. That, however, would be out of character. Banks has always been an absolutist by temperament.

Another theory is that ACT, or as much of the party as remains extant, has impressed upon him his duty to uphold its laissez faire libertarian principles. To a classical ACT person, this one requires no more than a second’s thought. The right to make a formal marriage contract is an issue of individual freedom and self-determination, it does not hurt or impinge on anyone else’s rights or freedoms, and it doesn’t even cost the taxpayer anything.

However, I’m pretty sure that Banks has been on one of those sentimental journeys I postulated above, and now genuinely thinks it’s time to put aside his old homophobic fears, in as much as he is able. In the same recent interview in which he laid out his Old Testament views about the origins of life, he said he had become less judgemental. Put this together with the fact that, since his foaming anti-Homosexual Law Reform Bill days, he has raised three children, and that he has nurtured a life-long compassion for animals, about whose welfare he can be quite militant, and you may well be looking at a closet liberal.
MostReadArticlesCollectionWidget - Most Read - Used in articles
AdvertModule - Advert - M-Rec / Halfpage

Latest

Film review: Ghost in the Shell
71490 2017-04-24 00:00:00Z Movies

Film review: Ghost in the Shell

by Russell Baillie

Nothing dates faster than a past idea of the future.

Read more
The rate of technological change is now exceeding our ability to adapt
71303 2017-04-24 00:00:00Z Technology

The rate of technological change is now exceeding …

by Peter Griffin

A decade on from the revolution of 2007, the pace and rate of change are exceeding our capacity to adapt to new technologies.

Read more
Government tests electric limo for Crown fleet
71520 2017-04-24 00:00:00Z Technology

Government tests electric limo for Crown fleet

by Benedict Collins

An electric-hybrid limousine is being put through its paces to see whether it's up to the job of transporting politicians and VIPs around the country.

Read more
What growing antibiotic resistance means for livestock and the environment
71360 2017-04-23 00:00:00Z Social issues

What growing antibiotic resistance means for lives…

by Sally Blundell

Animals kept in close proximity, like battery chickens, are at risk of infectious disease outbreaks that require antibiotic use.

Read more
The little-known story of Ernest Rutherford's secret anti-submarine work in WWI
71418 2017-04-23 00:00:00Z History

The little-known story of Ernest Rutherford's secr…

by Frank Duffield

Famous for his work splitting the atom, Ernest Rutherford also distinguished himself in secret anti-submarine research that helped the Allies win WWI.

Read more
Book review: Larchfield by Polly Clark
71160 2017-04-23 00:00:00Z Books

Book review: Larchfield by Polly Clark

by Nicholas Reid

Poet WH Auden stars in time-hurdling novel – as a life coach to a lonely mum.

Read more
A Way with Words: Fiona Farrell
71329 2017-04-23 00:00:00Z Books

A Way with Words: Fiona Farrell

by Fiona Farrell

Do I have a routine? Yes indeed. Otherwise I’d never get anything done. I am very distractible. Suggest coffee and I’ll be there.

Read more
The blue zone: Kiwi workers' wage gap trap
71457 2017-04-23 00:00:00Z Economy

The blue zone: Kiwi workers' wage gap trap

by Virginia Larson

For blue-collar workers, the gap between the haves and the have-littles is widening.

Read more