Sports scandals: Going the distance

by Paul Thomas / 28 February, 2013
Treating sporting stars as role models can be problematic.
Oscar Pistorius - one of the most competitive animals on Earth
Oscar Pistorius: one of the most competitive animals on Earth. Photo/Getty Images.

Eat your heart out, show business: when it comes to riveting murder scandals, you’ve got nothing on sport.

Sure, the Los Angeles coroner is trying to breathe fresh life into Natalie Wood’s drowning, but that was 30 years ago and we still don’t know if there was foul play or if she just had too much to drink and fell overboard. Yes, quite a few rappers seem to live fast and die young, but then dying in a hail of bullets is to gangstas what being gored by bulls is to matadors: an occupational hazard.

In not much more than a decade, sport has given us OJ Simpson and Oscar Pistorius. If the bail hearing was anything to go by, the Pistorius trial will be the hottest ticket in global entertainment. The only question is whether it can keep generating plot twists to match that of the lead detective being charged with attempted murder.

Some may consider this approach reprehensibly flippant given that an apparently blameless young woman has died in horrible or tragic circumstances.

Having had his sense of humour, not to mention his life, severely dented by an eye-watering matrimonial settlement, former comic genius John Cleese emerged from a largely joke-free hiatus to tweet, “Oscar’s defence will be that he was absolutely legless at the time.”

This was reported censoriously, beneath headlines suggesting the tweet had caused “outrage” among Cleese’s followers. On closer inspection it turned out that retweets and favourites outnumbered complaints by roughly 1500 to one.

In reality, Pistorius’s involvement is the only thing that differentiates this case from any number of similarly sad and/or sordid incidents. Unless they are spectacularly lurid or involve famous people, these events are like trees that fall in the forest, because our fascination with celebrity scandal outweighs our capacity to empathise when tragedy strikes people we don’t know in faraway places.

This case reinforces the fact that sport is now a branch of the global entertainment industry, but it also highlights the danger of treating sporting stars as role models. (Last year, Time nominated Pistorius as one of the world’s 100 most influential people.)

Pistorius’s refusal to be defined by his disability was something to behold. He is obviously ferociously determined and one of the most competitive animals on Earth, which are pluses for an athlete, but don’t necessarily make you delightful company.

The problem with making people role models based on what they do in a professional capacity in the public arena is that those attributes and achievements are not a reliable guide to the private individual. Which tells us more about Pistorius the person, his athletic performances or the fact that three weeks before he shot his girlfriend with his licensed 9mm pistol, he applied for licences for another six firearms?

Pistorius’s nickname, “Blade Runner”, has showbiz origins, being the title of the 1982 Ridley Scott movie, now rightfully regarded as a masterpiece, although at the time its blend of neo-noir and science fiction left critics and audiences bemused.

I wonder how many of those still using the nickname are aware that blade runners were professional hitmen, albeit state-sanctioned. Reluctant blade runner Deckard (Harrison Ford) is coerced into hunting down four replicants – genetically engineered organic robots; “more human than human”, in the words of their creator – who illegally return to Earth after being deployed “off-world”.

“The report said ‘Routine retirement of a replicant,’” says Deckard in a voiceover after dispatching the first of them. “That didn’t make me feel any better about shooting a woman in the back.”

MostReadArticlesCollectionWidget - Most Read - Used in articles
AdvertModule - Advert - M-Rec / Halfpage


Richard Dawkins' truth, science and tediousness
76845 2017-07-25 00:00:00Z Books

Richard Dawkins' truth, science and tediousness

by Danyl McLauchlan

Richard Dawkins’ profound admiration for himself comes through loud and clear – with footnotes.

Read more
As anti-vaccination numbers rise, is it a case of herd stupidity, not immunity?
75047 2017-07-25 00:00:00Z Health

As anti-vaccination numbers rise, is it a case of …

by Sarah Lang

It’s astonishing just how many well-educated, presumably semi-intelligent New Zealanders subscribe to and try to spread this kind of nonsense.

Read more
The dreaded autocorrect disaster
76840 2017-07-25 00:00:00Z Life in NZ

The dreaded autocorrect disaster

by Joanne Black

Autocorrect may hide your texting and typing bloopers, but it won’t stop your blushes.

Read more
Retailers say competition laws block charge on plastic bags
76850 2017-07-24 16:14:42Z Environment

Retailers say competition laws block charge on pla…

by RNZ

1.5 billion plastic bags are used here each year and on average it takes just 12 minutes before a bag enters the waste stream.

Read more
Crossword 1037 answers and explanations
6 reasons your next family holiday should be in Taranaki
Housing on Auckland's fringes not sprawl, says mayor Phil Goff
76773 2017-07-24 07:22:26Z Economy

Housing on Auckland's fringes not sprawl, says may…

by Todd Niall

More government money is being poured into housing developments on the edge of Auckland - but the result won't be sprawl, says mayor Phil Goff.

Read more
A post-mortem on Todd Barclay and Matt McCarten's fiascos
76497 2017-07-24 00:00:00Z Politics

A post-mortem on Todd Barclay and Matt McCarten's …

by Jane Clifton

In the catalogue of disaster, is a Todd Barclay worse than a Matt McCarten?

Read more