The all-purpose snarky internet article

by Toby Manhire / 19 November, 2013
The ultimate generic Opinion Piece on A Controversial Topic - complete with user comments.
An XKCD classic.

Sometimes the internet seems to be made up entirely of a snide denunciation of this, a snarky defence of that.

And into that diatribe soup arrives an all-purpose example of the form, from Edward Sharp-Paul at the Australian pop culture website Junkee.

Under the headline “An Opinion Piece on A Controversial Topic”, he writes: “I was inspired to write this piece by Currently Fashionable Polemicist”.

He offers the assurance that “In case you think that I have taken a knee-jerk stance without giving the Issue due consideration, I used The Google to do some research”.

And: “I also have a deeply personal and sad experience, which I will bring up here to invalidate your objections.”

He offers “an unattributed stock photo”, a digression to a completely unrelated matter and a baffling attempt to conflate the issues.

If you disagree with me on the relationship between this issue and the one at hand, here’s a false equivalence comparing the Issue to slavery, or Nazism, or some other horrific historical example.

A concluding flourish:

You might have noticed that I have spent more time attacking the hypothetical positions of my opponents than actually clarifying my own position on this Issue. I will grant you that tiny concession, hypothetical-reader-with-whom-I’m-carrying-on-a-conversation, but you have failed to take into account that, prior to submitting this article, I also found some statistics. It’s basically checkmate.

And the sign-off:

Author byline with impressive achievements, a plug for a recent publication, and a lot of loaded buzzwords.

It’s a barbed and funny piece – and the selective quotation doesn’t quite do it justice – but even funnier are the comments.

The first few, of more than 300:

On a related note, the year’s most incisive, and hilarious, picking-apart of internet discourse is Top Phillips’ “29 Stages of a Twitterstorm” at Buzzfeed UK. If you haven’t already, go read it now.


See also: Goldmine or gutter - the debate over online comments

Follow the Listener on Twitter or Facebook.

MostReadArticlesCollectionWidget - Most Read - Used in articles
AdvertModule - Advert - M-Rec / Halfpage


Richard Dawkins' truth, science and tediousness
76845 2017-07-25 00:00:00Z Books

Richard Dawkins' truth, science and tediousness

by Danyl McLauchlan

Richard Dawkins’ profound admiration for himself comes through loud and clear – with footnotes.

Read more
As anti-vaccination numbers rise, is it a case of herd stupidity, not immunity?
75047 2017-07-25 00:00:00Z Health

As anti-vaccination numbers rise, is it a case of …

by Sarah Lang

It’s astonishing just how many well-educated, presumably semi-intelligent New Zealanders subscribe to and try to spread this kind of nonsense.

Read more
The dreaded autocorrect disaster
76840 2017-07-25 00:00:00Z Life in NZ

The dreaded autocorrect disaster

by Joanne Black

Autocorrect may hide your texting and typing bloopers, but it won’t stop your blushes.

Read more
Retailers say competition laws block charge on plastic bags
76850 2017-07-24 16:14:42Z Environment

Retailers say competition laws block charge on pla…

by RNZ

1.5 billion plastic bags are used here each year and on average it takes just 12 minutes before a bag enters the waste stream.

Read more
Crossword 1037 answers and explanations
6 reasons your next family holiday should be in Taranaki
Housing on Auckland's fringes not sprawl, says mayor Phil Goff
76773 2017-07-24 07:22:26Z Economy

Housing on Auckland's fringes not sprawl, says may…

by Todd Niall

More government money is being poured into housing developments on the edge of Auckland - but the result won't be sprawl, says mayor Phil Goff.

Read more
A post-mortem on Todd Barclay and Matt McCarten's fiascos
76497 2017-07-24 00:00:00Z Politics

A post-mortem on Todd Barclay and Matt McCarten's …

by Jane Clifton

In the catalogue of disaster, is a Todd Barclay worse than a Matt McCarten?

Read more