The all-purpose snarky internet articleby Toby Manhire
The ultimate generic Opinion Piece on A Controversial Topic - complete with user comments.
Sometimes the internet seems to be made up entirely of a snide denunciation of this, a snarky defence of that.
And into that diatribe soup arrives an all-purpose example of the form, from Edward Sharp-Paul at the Australian pop culture website Junkee.
Under the headline “An Opinion Piece on A Controversial Topic”, he writes: “I was inspired to write this piece by Currently Fashionable Polemicist”.
He offers the assurance that “In case you think that I have taken a knee-jerk stance without giving the Issue due consideration, I used The Google to do some research”.
And: “I also have a deeply personal and sad experience, which I will bring up here to invalidate your objections.”
He offers “an unattributed stock photo”, a digression to a completely unrelated matter and a baffling attempt to conflate the issues.
If you disagree with me on the relationship between this issue and the one at hand, here’s a false equivalence comparing the Issue to slavery, or Nazism, or some other horrific historical example.
A concluding flourish:
You might have noticed that I have spent more time attacking the hypothetical positions of my opponents than actually clarifying my own position on this Issue. I will grant you that tiny concession, hypothetical-reader-with-whom-I’m-carrying-on-a-conversation, but you have failed to take into account that, prior to submitting this article, I also found some statistics. It’s basically checkmate.
And the sign-off:
Author byline with impressive achievements, a plug for a recent publication, and a lot of loaded buzzwords.
It’s a barbed and funny piece – and the selective quotation doesn’t quite do it justice – but even funnier are the comments.
The first few, of more than 300:
On a related note, the year’s most incisive, and hilarious, picking-apart of internet discourse is Top Phillips’ “29 Stages of a Twitterstorm” at Buzzfeed UK. If you haven’t already, go read it now.
See also: Goldmine or gutter - the debate over online comments
Follow the Listener on Twitter or Facebook.
It’s astonishing just how many well-educated, presumably semi-intelligent New Zealanders subscribe to and try to spread this kind of nonsense.Read more
1.5 billion plastic bags are used here each year and on average it takes just 12 minutes before a bag enters the waste stream.Read more
More government money is being poured into housing developments on the edge of Auckland - but the result won't be sprawl, says mayor Phil Goff.Read more
In the catalogue of disaster, is a Todd Barclay worse than a Matt McCarten?Read more