Murder on the Orient Express – movie reviewby James Robins
It’s elegant and star-studded, but this update on Agatha Christie’s rail tale lacks puff.
Kenneth Branagh directs this steaming behemoth, adapted from Agatha Christie’s famous 1934 mystery, and takes up the bewhiskered mantle of Hercule Poirot, the world’s greatest detective, possessor of mankind’s most elaborate moustache and prizewinner for ridiculous Belgian accents.
Branagh plays him with more pep and sprightliness than Albert Finney’s 1974 version or David Suchet’s long-running TV turn, adding a dash of the quixotic and a hint of obsessive-compulsive disorder. In Poirot’s mind, there is right and wrong and nothing in between. Any deviation from this clean alignment unsettles him more than the uneven eggs he’s served for breakfast. (He deduces it’s the hen’s fault.)
After some introductory sleuthing and dubious CGI cityscapes of Jerusalem and Istanbul, we finally climb aboard the Express and meet the passengers, the camera tracking the length of the carriages in a single take, introducing a starry ensemble cast as if they were already in a police line-up: Judi Dench looking glamorously dangerous as a Russian princess, Daisy Ridley’s clipped and smiley governess, Johnny Depp’s slick art dealer quickly and thankfully despatched, Olivia Colman, Willem Dafoe, Penélope Cruz, an imperious Michelle Pfeiffer, and many more.
Once they’re bound for Paris, twin tragedies strike: an avalanche strands the train and there’s a bump in the night, the crime scene cleverly and teasingly shot from above as if this really was a game of Cluedo.
The thrill of Christie’s stories is not necessarily in discovering who the killer is, but how Poirot pins them down. He sets about detecting, and we settle in for some fine actorly flourishes. Only they never arrive. These interrogation scenes ought to be riven with doubt and misgiving – a combat between Poirot’s smarts and his prey’s slip-ups. But they pass without even a hint of intrigue. Branagh just wrinkles his moustache like a terrier and unleashes a ridiculous exclamation: “Ze killar iz mockeeing mee!” Or, “Forgeev me, I’m Bellzhin.”
And again, despite Poirot’s lectures on good and evil, and the final reveal arranged to look like a picnic version of the Last Supper, the traumatic origin of the crime and its dubious moral outcome never quite trouble us as perhaps they should.
Branagh’s attempt at a Christie is certainly handsome and not without a few sly grins, but there’s something frustratingly stuffy and pedestrian about it, as if he got caught up in eccentricities and period details and forgot that a mystery ought to be mysterious.
video by 20th Century Fox NZ
IN CINEMAS NOW
This article was first published in the November 18, 2017 issue of the New Zealand Listener.
I predicted Bill English would lose the election and the winner would be Winston Peters. But no forecaster, including the PM, predicted her pregnancy.Read more
New essays on New Zealand-born US artist Len Lye elevate him to the status of Australasia’s most notable 20th-century artist.Read more
For about a third of infertility cases in New Zealand, there is no obvious reason why seemingly fertile couples struggle to conceive.Read more
More than one million images from Rykenberg Photography, taken around Auckland, are now in the Auckland Libraries Collection. But who are the people?Read more
A Golden Bay man spending his first night in his new house says he woke to find his bed, walls and floor covered in hundreds of creepy crawlies.Read more
There's a growing movement to stop the amount of wasteful plastic that goes into our oceans, but what about the tiny bits we can hardly see?Read more
The inconvenience to chlorine refuseniks is tiny compared with the risk of more suffering and tragedy from another Havelock North-style contamination.Read more