Bill Ralston: Calling the shots

by Bill Ralston / 03 April, 2017
RelatedArticlesModule - Afghanistan
Hager, Keating, English and Stephenson. Photo/Getty/Supplied

Let’s wait for all the facts before jumping to hasty conclusions about the SAS operation in Afghanistan.

If you interviewed a dozen witnesses to a road accident several years after the event, you would probably have a dozen differing accounts. So it is with the Hit & Run story about an NZ Special Air Service (SAS) raid in Afghanistan.

Investigative journalists Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson, who wrote the book, say the SAS and its support botched the operation, killing several civilians in what they call potential “war crimes”. Lieutenant General Tim Keating and the military say that is not true, that Operation Burnham occurred 2km away across rugged hills surrounding the Tirgiran Valley from where Hit & Run claims and that there were almost certainly no civilian casualties. Prime Minister Bill English looks a little uncomfortable, but for now is standing by the military and has not ruled out an inquiry.

Hager and Stephenson quote Afghan villagers and anonymous Defence sources who they say were involved or had knowledge of the incident. Keating quotes military records and inquiries done at the time of the raid seven years ago, claiming any casualties were insurgents.

But this week, Hager and Stephenson admitted the village location in their books is wrong – and the attacks took place about 2km from where they stated. In a letter to the Prime Minster, Afghan villagers agreed the raid happened in the location identified earlier this week by the NZDF, but disputed it was a village called Tigiran.

Who to believe? The one thing I feel sure about is that the SAS did not commit “war crimes”. In war, civilian casualties occur. In World War II, more than 30 million civilians were killed. Although some died as the result of war crimes – for example, in Eastern Europe and Russia – many more were killed in bombings or by falling shells and stray rounds in battle zones. The words “war crimes” imply an atrocity, a deliberate act of murder of unarmed civilians rather than inadvertent deaths that occurred as a result of fire exchanged during a conflict. Even Hager and Stephenson do not allege the SAS deliberately lined up civilians and shot them.

I know personally many of the main protagonists in this argument. Keating is a rugged, intelligent and, by all appearances, decent man. Hager, in my experience, is a committed, bright and passionate researcher. English is an earnest, thoughtful man who would not knowingly take part in a cover-up of war crimes. Stephenson is an enthusiastic and dedicated journalist. But if I were the editor, I would want to constantly check and recheck his facts in case his enthusiasm led him a step too far in his story.

I know a couple of ex-SAS servicemen. I would not like to be their enemy. The SAS are highly trained, ruthlessly efficient and probably among the most accomplished special forces in the world. Several years ago, when in Washington, I met a senior US intelligence official who was fulsome in his praise of the SAS. Again and again he stressed the importance of the role the SAS was playing in Afghanistan. By contrast, he was dismissive of the Defence reconstruction team in Bamyan, as he was completely focused on the need for the SAS. Understandable, I guess, as he was a blood’n’guts intelligence guy.

A recent newspaper story said our involvement in Afghanistan cost us more than $300 million, an entire decade of time and, most importantly, the lives of eight service people. We need to remember those eight dead when we consider our response to Hit & Run.

Many folk have seized on the issue to politically attack the Government, via the military. Many have automatically believed the authors because it suits their political beliefs. I would rather wait for all the facts to emerge before rushing to judgement but, as with the road accident I mentioned earlier, a single clear story of those events is highly unlikely to emerge.

This article was first published in the April 8, 2017 issue of the New Zealand Listener. Follow the Listener on Twitter, Facebook and sign up to the weekly newsletter.

MostReadArticlesCollectionWidget - Most Read - Used in articles
AdvertModule - Advert - M-Rec / Halfpage

Latest

The 20 Best Movies of 2017
85197 2017-12-15 11:49:48Z Movies

The 20 Best Movies of 2017

by The Listener

Listener reviewers James Robins and Peter Calder pick the best films they’ve seen in the past year.

Read more
Win a double pass to The Post
85156 2017-12-15 09:53:04Z Win

Win a double pass to The Post

by The Listener

Be in to win tickets to a preview screening of The Post in either Auckland, Christchurch or Wellington.

Read more
Why did TVNZ's Mike Hosking and Toni Street call it quits?
85153 2017-12-15 07:18:32Z Television

Why did TVNZ's Mike Hosking and Toni Street call i…

by Colin Peacock

TVNZ insists the pair want to spend more time with families and radio jobs. What's next for a show that's often in the news because of its hosts?

Read more
National claims government accounts show big hole
85149 2017-12-15 06:32:15Z Politics

National claims government accounts show big hole

by Chris Bramwell

National says the opening of the government books yesterday backs up its argument that Labour has a massive hole in its accounts.

Read more
Donald Dux: An extraordinary year of President Trump
84715 2017-12-15 00:00:00Z World

Donald Dux: An extraordinary year of President Tru…

by Paul Thomas

Paul Thomas has chronicled the Trump presidency since its beginning and reviews the extraordinary year since The Donald entered the White House.

Read more
Former punk Kody Nielson is heading in a new direction
84445 2017-12-15 00:00:00Z Music

Former punk Kody Nielson is heading in a new direc…

by James Belfield

But it’s no less entertaining.

Read more
The 10 Best Tech Gadgets of 2017
85128 2017-12-15 00:00:00Z Technology

The 10 Best Tech Gadgets of 2017

by Peter Griffin

A round-up of the best and grooviest gadgets from 2017 and previews of top tech tempters for the new year.

Read more
Cervical-cancer screening tests are about to change
84383 2017-12-15 00:00:00Z Health

Cervical-cancer screening tests are about to chang…

by Nicky Pellegrino

Cervical-cancer screening tests have been helping to save lives for more than 25 years. Now the focus of the tests is going to change.

Read more