Roseanne and the art vs the artist dilemma

by Diana Wichtel / 11 April, 2018
RelatedArticlesModule - Roseanne

Roseanne: same old couch, same old cast, still controversial.

Roseanne rebooted still doesn’t explain why a badass feminist would vote Trump. 

Those who forget the past are condemned to watch reboots of 90s television shows. The X-Files, Twin Peaks … Now, Roseanne going for gold when it comes to nostalgia and, depending on your tolerance for Trump-era Roseanne Barr, a range of less agreeable emotions. Still, it will fill in the time until the robots take over or, as Roseanne’s still-liberal sister Jackie fears, the president who shall not be named blows up the world.

Same old kitchen table, same old couch, same chicken shirt. Also untouched by time are the tropes of the classic American sitcom, as ritualised as kabuki theatre. Everyone still lurches into shot to shout one-liners at each other, and the underlying family devotion is expressed in extended bouts of maniacal laughter. Viewers longing to become reacquainted with the tonsils of Roseanne when she’s in full roar have had their dreams fulfilled before the end of the opening titles.

Same old cast. The original show’s final season, in which the Conners won the lottery and the show stopped making any sense, rendered a reunion problematic. In the finale, it turned out the good fortune was just a story Roseanne was writing to deal with her grief at the death from a heart attack of Dan. Or something.

Barr didn’t deserve the sexism the storyline copped from some commentators – a blue-collar “domestic goddess” isn’t allowed to become a famous writer, apparently – but the show jumped a whole school of sharks and Dan was dead. Never mind. On Planet Sitcom, the deceased can be rebooted like some once-audacious television comedy. “Dan!” shrieks Roseanne in the opening scene. “I thought you were dead!”

Roseanne was groundbreaking: it starred a generously proportioned, loudmouth badass who wasn’t male, and storylines included abortion, racism, PMS and mental illness. The reboot has also proved controversial. Roseanne is now a Trump supporter. There are jokes about healthcare. “Wassup, deplorable?” says her sister Jackie, wearing a pussy hat and “Nasty Woman” T-shirt. Roseanne calls her “snowflake” and declares, “Aunt Jackie thinks every girl should grow up and be president – even if they’re a liar, liar, pantsuit on fire.” Fair enough. The character had a history of poor life choices.

But there’s the art vs the artist dilemma: can you appreciate the art while deploring the artist? Barr has been in bother for tweeting mad Trump-friendly conspiracy theories and Fox News talking points. Her social-media presence is not for the faint-hearted. Trump rang to congratulate her on the show’s premiere, though the tiresome conservative commentator Ben Shapiro railed that the reboot has adhered to its liberal origins, citing the storyline involving the Conners’ little grandson, Mark, who prefers girls’ clothes. Roseanne and Dan are kind of okay with that. The outrage.

It’s still a sitcom. Everyone can be at each other’s throats only to hug and make up at the end of the commercial half hour. I’ll keep watching, for the wonderful Laurie Metcalf and a bemused-looking John Goodman. But there’s little insight into why a formerly left-wing, feminist, working-class woman such as Roseanne Conner might vote for Trump. Life hadn’t turned out as she’d hoped. Where was her American dream? “He said he’d shake things up,” she says vaguely. Drain the swamp, build the wall, whatever. Do something.

It’s easier to see why Barr – rich, famous, never quite Hollywood and possibly bored – might see Trump as a role model. As Jimmy Kimmel pointed out to her on his talk show, “You were kind of the original crazy tweeter.”

In 2012, when a lamentably unqualified buffoon of a television star doing such a thing was more of a novelty, she ran for president. As Kimmel told her through slightly gritted teeth, “You’re expressing your views, as crazy as they may be.” In these absurd times, we should be grateful she’s only making another sitcom.

ROSEANNE, Three, Thursday, 7.30pm.

This article was first published in the April 14, 2018 issue of the New Zealand Listener.

Latest

Why ethical eating often stops at the restaurant door
101520 2019-01-22 00:00:00Z Food

Why ethical eating often stops at the restaurant d…

by Rachel A. Ankeny and Heather Bray

Can a chef promote foraging, seasonality and plant-based eating, yet also serve meat and other animal-derived protein products on the same menu?

Read more
Why the Dunedin Museum of Natural Mystery is bound to attract the curious
101463 2019-01-22 00:00:00Z Life in NZ

Why the Dunedin Museum of Natural Mystery is bound…

by Ellen Rykers

Artist Bruce Mahalski's museum is the result of a lifetime of collecting.

Read more
Gillette ad isn't anti-men, it's anti-toxic masculinity – it should be welcomed
101480 2019-01-21 16:59:29Z Social issues

Gillette ad isn't anti-men, it's anti-toxic mascul…

by Nicola Bishop

The backlash against the Gillette ad shows how painfully little distance we as a society have covered since the #MeToo movement.

Read more
Cost of Auckland public transport to go up
101459 2019-01-21 14:08:56Z Auckland Issues

Cost of Auckland public transport to go up

by RNZ

Auckland's public transport users will soon see fares increase by up to 50 cents.

Read more
The future of gangs in New Zealand
101322 2019-01-21 00:00:00Z Social issues

The future of gangs in New Zealand

by Philippa Tolley

Best of RNZ: Gangs have been a feature of New Zealand society for more than half a century. Philippa Tolley takes a look at what future lies ahead.

Read more
How some Germans are countering the extremist views of the far-right
101320 2019-01-21 00:00:00Z World

How some Germans are countering the extremist view…

by Cathrin Schaer

Germans face a familiar dilemma in finding ways to oppose the views of the far-right Alternative for Germany party.

Read more
White Noise: Who is shaping Auckland's future?
101439 2019-01-21 00:00:00Z Auckland Issues

White Noise: Who is shaping Auckland's future?

by Kate Newton

Some Aucklanders have more say in their city's future than others.

Read more
Stephen Fry revisits the world of the Ancient Greeks in Heroes
101242 2019-01-21 00:00:00Z Books

Stephen Fry revisits the world of the Ancient Gree…

by Lauren Buckeridge

In his delightful way, Stephen Fry dips back into the ancient world with more stories of tests, quests and feats of old.

Read more