The Government’s Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill has no integrity at all

by The Listener / 06 September, 2018
Winston Peters and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. Photo/Getty Images

Winston Peters and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. Photo/Getty Images

RelatedArticlesModule - Government electoral integrity bill
The Government’s Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill is misnamed. It is unnecessary, unethical and an example of coalition trade-offs of the worst kind. It has no integrity, not even in brackets.

Known as the “waka-jumping” bill, the proposed legislation has quietly slid down Parliament’s Order Paper and is now in about 12th spot. The public might surmise that the Government is in no mood for another round of slap-downs from the wide range of voices – on all sides of politics – who argue this bill should be abandoned.

Governments should be very careful about making changes to the way MPs are hatched or dispatched, or the way Parliament functions, that require only a simple majority. The same caution would have applied to the National Party, which, when previously in Opposition, proposed abolishing the Māori seats. Dropping the proposal was one of the concessions the Māori Party extracted from National in exchange for its support in 2008. The status quo prevailed. The integrity of the electoral system would also be served if the Greens voted against the waka-jumping bill, as respected former co-leader Jeanette Fitzsimons has urged. Unfortunately, they show no sign of heeding her.

The bill’s explanatory note begins by saying that it amends the Electoral Act “in order to enhance public confidence in the integrity of the electoral system by upholding the proportionality of political party representation in Parliament as determined by electors”. This is pure spin. The bill, if and when it becomes law, will unashamedly and blatantly serve political parties, rather than the public. It does not enhance public confidence in the integrity of the electoral system. Quite the reverse – it invites cynicism towards political parties and, in particular, their leaders.

When enacted, this bill will mean that the leader of a political party can write to the Speaker saying they believe that one of their MPs has distorted the proportionality of Parliament and may do so again. In other words, the MP has not voted with the rest of their caucus. As long as the leader has the agreement of two-thirds of the parliamentary party, the MP will lose their seat.

Jeanette Fitzsimons. Photo/David White

In New Zealand, members of Parliament are elected either to represent an electorate – the people living in a particular geographical area – or from a list published by a political party before an election. In either event, voters are aware who they are voting for. Once in Parliament, the public expects those MPs to exercise good judgment. Usually, that judgment will be consistent with the philosophy of the party to which an MP belongs. However, there are sometimes good reasons an MP may not always vote with the rest of their caucus. Jim Anderton, who founded the NewLabour Party, argued that he did not leave the Labour Party; it left him. He had a good case for making that claim. Under waka-jumping legislation, he may well have lost his seat in Parliament, where he was the duly elected MP for Sydenham.

The proposed law is harsh in applying to electorate MPs. Plenty of electors split their vote – choosing the party they wish to see govern and an electorate candidate who may or may not belong to that party.

Electorate MPs, in other words, are not elected solely on party affiliation. It may even be their maverick status that got them elected. But at least, if thrown out under the waka-jumping law, they would have the opportunity to contest a by-election.

List MPs who get offside with their party leader face electoral oblivion. That threat can only turn these representatives into slavish devotees of their leaders. In some parties, the leader already has a huge amount of sway and can influence the order of the party list and the selection of electorate candidates. But whether or not those candidates make it to Parliament is the prerogative of the people. Whether they are kicked out should also be the prerogative of the people.

The effect of this bill, if passed, will be to silence voices in the one place where vigorous debate is required, and even has particular legal protection. Parliament is big enough to cope with dissent. Labour, New Zealand First and the Greens, it seems, are not.

This editorial was first published in the September 15, 2018 issue of the New Zealand Listener.

Latest

How new cafe Generosity Coffee is helping the Birkenhead community
100223 2018-12-10 15:31:37Z Auckland Eats

How new cafe Generosity Coffee is helping the Birk…

by Alex Blackwood

A new cafe and roastery on the North Shore is doing good with its business model.

Read more
New street food-inspired restaurant Gao opens in Albany
100204 2018-12-10 12:49:49Z Auckland Eats

New street food-inspired restaurant Gao opens in A…

by Jean Teng

Auckland's latest Asian fusion restaurant takes cues from street food eateries.

Read more
Westport campers awake to find wads of cash on their cars and tents
100187 2018-12-10 11:38:35Z Life in NZ

Westport campers awake to find wads of cash on the…

by RNZ

Holidaymakers at a remote campground north of Westport awoke to find wads of cash had been left for them yesterday morning.

Read more
Ditch the intergenerational housing blame game, and focus on some home truths
99836 2018-12-10 00:00:00Z Social issues

Ditch the intergenerational housing blame game, an…

by Virginia Larson

What we don’t need is sloppy statistics kindling an intergenerational stoush that does no one any good.

Read more
Sally Lewis: The modern-day monk teaching meditation to prisoners
100143 2018-12-10 00:00:00Z Profiles

Sally Lewis: The modern-day monk teaching meditati…

by Clare de Lore

Could an ancient form of meditation change the lives of prisoners for better? Sally Lewis says it can.

Read more
What's inside North & South's January 2019 issue?
99815 2018-12-10 00:00:00Z Life in NZ

What's inside North & South's January 2019 issue?

by North & South

We look at the riskiest places in NZ to live, what it'll take to fix the Family Court and review 2018's weirdest and wackiest things.

Read more
The Brexit deal is the perfect Prisoner's Dilemma
100059 2018-12-09 00:00:00Z World

The Brexit deal is the perfect Prisoner's Dilemma

by Andrew Anthony

In the Prisoner's Dilemma, going after what you want – freedom – might get you the very worst outcome. It's Brexit, in other words.

Read more
How Britain's MI6 gave the world modern spycraft
100061 2018-12-09 00:00:00Z Television

How Britain's MI6 gave the world modern spycraft

by Fiona Rae

Espionage nerd David Jason takes us inside the world of secret agents, including the inaugural MI6 boss’ car.

Read more