Bill Ralston: Why the euthanasia bill doesn't go far enough

by Bill Ralston / 09 July, 2019
Photo/Getty Images

Photo/Getty Images

RelatedArticlesModule - euthanasia bill

New Zealand's euthanasia bill is a step in the right direction, but it could do more.

Please don’t kill me. That was my first reaction to the End of Life Choice Bill that the polls show most of the population agrees with. Of course, although I’m in my mid-sixties, I’m reasonably hale and hearty and surrounded by people I know and love in a warm house by the sea. I am quite prepared to stick around for a while.

Yet under the proposed law, if I were diagnosed with a terminal disease, and two doctors were willing to certify that I would not survive another six months, I could put up my shaking hand and ask for a clinical ejector seat that would fire me speedily and, one hopes, painlessly into the great unknown.

The key word here is “painlessly”. Going stoned unto death has some attraction. However, too often in my experience of the natural departure of aged friends and parents, the medical fraternity cannot always contain the pain of the slowly dying. That would not be nice. Who wants to end a long and fruitful life in agony?

The presence of high levels of pain that cannot be abated should be one of the criteria for a doctor stepping in, at your request, to metaphorically turn out the lights.

The specified six-month clause for recipients of the gift of euthanasia is more of a worry. If a specialist told me I had less than half a year to go, but I would be quite comfortable for that period, I’d like to think I would have a party for everyone I knew and liked. I would milk the drama, spend the last of my accumulated savings on fun and eventually fade into blissful, natural oblivion.

A dying friend and colleague did exactly that. Knowing he had a terminal condition, he arranged a pre-wake for himself in a waterfront bar. All his mates turned up, gave eulogies, and we had a whale of a time.

The fact that under the proposed law you would have to be actually dying within six months to be “assisted” to the other side is unfortunate. There are people who have grossly debilitating diseases who cannot face going on for a long, indeterminate period.

One of my first girlfriends, a determined person even when young, surfaced in the media years later because she had committed suicide rather than submit to the slow, total loss of bodily control. She recorded a farewell message and explanation of what she was doing. The police charged her partner with contributing to her death because he allegedly provided the means by which she could end her life. A jury, thankfully, acquitted him.

It is sad that she was forced to end her life alone in a gruesome and probably painful way, rather than with a medically administered drug that would have eased her into that good night. Her taped testimony showed that she was sane, had thought her act through and had concluded that life was no longer worth living because of her devastating illness.

Where does this bill leave a tetraplegic who cannot face the thought of being trapped forever within his or her frozen body? Under the proposed law, they cannot be “assisted” to die.

Personally, as long as I could read and watch Netflix, I would probably be happy to stay on, because my customary position is prone on a couch. But I can understand there are people who, because of physical infirmity, no longer wish to cling to life.

The right to a medically assisted death needs to be expanded beyond the bill’s present scope and made law.

This column was first published in the July 13, 2019 issue of the New Zealand Listener.

Latest

Writer Robert Macfarlane finds deeps truths in Underland
108287 2019-07-17 00:00:00Z Books

Writer Robert Macfarlane finds deeps truths in Und…

by Tony Murrow

In a new book, Robert Macfarlane heads underground to ponder mankind’s effect on the planet.

Read more
Why extra virgin olive oil is back on the menu for frying
108203 2019-07-17 00:00:00Z Nutrition

Why extra virgin olive oil is back on the menu for…

by Jennifer Bowden

For decades, the word in the kitchen has been that olive oil shouldn’t be used for frying, but new research could change that.

Read more
Abstract artist Gretchen Albrecht's true colours
108108 2019-07-16 00:00:00Z Profiles

Abstract artist Gretchen Albrecht's true colours

by Linda Herrick

Gretchen Albrecht paintings may be intangible, but they are triggered by real-life experience, she tells Linda Herrick.

Read more
That's a Bit Racist is playful, but it packs a punch
108435 2019-07-16 00:00:00Z Television

That's a Bit Racist is playful, but it packs a pun…

by Diana Wichtel

The taboo-busting doco is trying to change our default settings on race, but some people aren't stoked.

Read more
Are there too many tourists in NZ?
108444 2019-07-16 00:00:00Z Life in NZ

Are there too many tourists in NZ?

by North & South

Here's what's inside North and South's August 2019 issue.

Read more
Huawei's dogged determination: Can it make a breakthrough in New Zealand?
108428 2019-07-16 00:00:00Z Tech

Huawei's dogged determination: Can it make a break…

by Peter Griffin

The tech company at the centre of a trade war between the US and China is willing to go to extraordinary lengths to prove it can be trusted.

Read more
The many miracles of Aretha Franklin movie Amazing Grace
108368 2019-07-15 00:00:00Z Movies

The many miracles of Aretha Franklin movie Amazing…

by Russell Baillie

A long-lost concert movie capturing Lady Soul in her prime is heading to the New Zealand International Film Festival.

Read more
The untold history of China's one child policy
108182 2019-07-14 00:00:00Z History

The untold history of China's one child policy

by RNZ

Nanfu Wang explains the story behind her film One Child Nation, which screens at the International Film Festival this July.

Read more