About time: A grammarian on the slipperiness of time

by Ray Prebble / 04 September, 2018

Photo/Getty.

You’ve arrived back from the UK, jet-lagged but laden with photocopies of parish records tracing your lineage back to the 1750s. The genealogical bug bit a few years ago, and now you’re all set to construct your family tree. You especially want to impress Martin, that smug know-it-all, so when you see him in the tearoom you excitedly announce, “I’ve traced my family tree back to Jebediah Swanson, born in Somerset on the 4th of September 1752. He was my great, great…”

“That’s impossible,” Martin snaps and walks off. You stand there mortified at not getting out all seven greats and wondering what Martin means.

He means there was no 4th of September 1752. The English Parliament finally made the 11-day adjustment (Wednesday 2 September was followed by Thursday 14 September) needed to compensate for the fact the Julian calendar had been getting out of synch with the solar year for centuries. Many European countries had long before adopted the Gregorian calendar, but the English viewed this time-adjusting business as Catholic skulduggery.

Historians need to be aware of these dates, otherwise they might wonder why someone set off across the Channel one day and arrived the week before.

Slipperiness of dates isn’t confined to history. For example, the attacks on the Twin Towers happened on 12 September 2001 – New Zealand time. If someone mentions 9/11, you can tell them it was in fact 12/9, thanks very much, and then start ranting about American cultural imperialism if they disagree. Of course, the events happened in the US, but what about the moon landing? Apollo 11 nestled on lunar soil on my mother’s birthday, 21 July 1969, not on 20 July, as Wikipedia would have you believe.

When it comes to writing about time, there are some common pitfalls. For example, if you say, “The project ran from 2003 to 2009”, how many years do you actually mean? Are you counting 2003 and 2009, in which case it is seven, or just the in-between years, in which case it could be six years – or even five.

Notice I said “from 2003 to 2009”. “From… to” is one of two common time-related pairs of conjoined twins with very specific rules:

Wrong: from 2003-2009

Correct: from 2003 to 2009

Wrong: between 1991-1996

Correct: between 1991 and 1996

More odd things happen when you squeeze the gap down to one year. If you refer to 2010-2011, or “from 2010 to 2011”, how many years are you talking about now? One? Two? In a real sense, the answer is no time at all. Think about it: how much time is there between 2010 and 2011? Time for that stolen kiss on the stroke of midnight? That’s why using a slash (oblique, or solidus) is very handy: 2010/2011, or 2010/11. This is particularly useful for financial years, but it’s excellent for indicating any period (such as summer) that spans from sometime in one year to sometime in the next.

And that’s “sometime”, by the way, not “some time”. There is a difference. It may take some time for your job application to go through (meaning quite a while), but you can expect to receive the result sometime in August (meaning at some stage).

In New Zealand, we follow UK practice and have the day first, as in 14 July 2017, whereas the Americans have the month first, which is both counterintuitive and requires an extra comma: July 14, 2017. Day, month, year is inarguably more logical than month, day, year, but as with most things, US style is starting to predominate – although I haven’t noticed any tendency to say “one hundred twenty-three” rather than “one hundred and twenty-three”.

Final tip: to avoid giving your version of Martin ammunition, remember it’s genealogy, not geneology. Getting that wrong is like cornering a paediatrician at a party and holding forth about your bunions. 

This was published in the June 2018 issue of North & South.

Latest

How NZ women won the right to vote first: The original disruptors & spiteful MPs
96463 2018-09-19 00:00:00Z History

How NZ women won the right to vote first: The orig…

by Vomle Springford

Is it right that while the loafer, the gambler, the drunkard, and even the wife-beater has a vote, earnest, educated and refined women are denied it?

Read more
Fémmina: The story of NZ's unsung suffrage provocateur Mary Ann Müller
96479 2018-09-19 00:00:00Z History

Fémmina: The story of NZ's unsung suffrage provoca…

by Cathie Bell

Mary Ann Müller was fighting for women’s rights before Kate Sheppard even arrived here, but her pioneering contribution to the cause is little known.

Read more
How Marilyn Waring went from political prodigy to international influencer
96505 2018-09-19 00:00:00Z Profiles

How Marilyn Waring went from political prodigy to …

by Clare de Lore

Marilyn Waring is nearing the last chapter of an account of her time as an MP, which ended abruptly with the calling of a snap election.

Read more
Ian McKellen charms his way through a documentary about his life
96472 2018-09-19 00:00:00Z Movies

Ian McKellen charms his way through a documentary …

by James Robins

Joe Stephenson’s tender documentary Playing the Part looks at McKellen's life as an actor, activist and perpetual wizard.

Read more
The Chosen Bun: A smart new burger joint opens in Stonefields
96507 2018-09-19 00:00:00Z Auckland Eats

The Chosen Bun: A smart new burger joint opens in …

by Alex Blackwood

Burgers, milkshakes and fries are not rare things to find in Auckland, so The Chosen Bun's owners were smart to be very picky about their ingredients.

Read more
The brutality experienced by the suffragettes
11636 2018-09-19 00:00:00Z Listener NZ 2015

The brutality experienced by the suffragettes

by Sally Blundell

As we mark 125 years since NZ women got the right to vote, we must remember it didn't come easily.

Read more
The case for closing prisons
96403 2018-09-18 00:00:00Z Social issues

The case for closing prisons

by Paul Little

If we want a prison system that does a better job than the current one, alternatives aren’t hard to find.

Read more
Jennifer Curtin: The feminist political scientist mixing rugby with politics
96422 2018-09-18 00:00:00Z Profiles

Jennifer Curtin: The feminist political scientist …

by Clare de Lore

Australian-New Zealander Jennifer Curtin says the lopsided nature of the Bledisloe Cup pales in comparison to the slump in transtasman relations.

Read more