Why did it take 53 months for NZ to introduce plain cigarette packs?

by Eric Crosbie & George Thomson / 14 June, 2018

Help us find and write the stories Kiwis need to read

Plain cigarette packs introduced to New Zealand.

Plain packaging - or lack of branding by tobacco companies - was finally introduced in March this year. Photo / Getty Images

RelatedArticlesModule - tobacco

The threat of legal action by tobacco companies in response to NZ introducing plain packs never eventuated - but Kiwis' health was harmed by the delay.

The tobacco industry hates regulations of any sort. Across the world, they use legal threats to bully governments that want to save lives with sensible and scientifically proven tobacco regulations. Kenya, Uruguay, Australia, Canada, Norway, and the UK, among other countries, have all suffered lawsuits by the industry to slow or stop tobacco regulations.

Because of the immense financial value of tobacco brands, and the crucial importance of marketing for the industry to recruit new smokers, they are especially active in legal threats against the use of plain pack regulation (standardised packs to remove logos, colours and other marketing tricks).



As governments have increasingly adopted tobacco advertising bans, these legal threats have escalated. This is because the package represents one of the last bastions of tobacco marketing. When Australia proposed plain packs, the industry feared the loss of this vital site for branding, and the precedent that Australia would supply to other countries.  They brought a number of legal actions against Australia, either directly, or through other countries, attempting to prevent or slow the new policy.

One of the intended side effects of these actions was to slow the use of plain packs in New Zealand and globally.

When New Zealand proposed introducing plain packs in 2012, tobacco companies threatened to sue the Government for billions of dollars in ‘compensation’. In doing so, the tobacco companies consistently cited their lawsuits against Australia as an example of what would happen if neighbouring New Zealand proceeded. Fearful of the diffusion of best practices, the tobacco industry saw the delay of plain packaging in New Zealand as part of preventing the spread of the policy regionally and globally. As a former vice president of Philip Morris put it, “a sneeze in one country today causes international pneumonia tomorrow.”      

 What was behind NZ's "wait and see" approach?

Instead of joining with Australia and introducing the measure in 2012, the New Zealand government delayed. They said that they needed to wait until the Australian lawsuits were decided. In doing so, they fell right into the industry’s trap.

This was despite being given expert international legal advice that the industry threats did not have any real legal basis, something which the industry’s own lawyers had advised the industry back in the 1990s. Plain packs were not introduced to New Zealand until 2018.

Besides the threats of legal action, there are other factors that may have contributed to the New Zealand delay. They include the closeness of the Government to the tobacco industry, and the Government’s reluctance to be seen to be regulating industries and acting against foreign investors in general.

The delay was despite New Zealand’s membership in an international tobacco control treaty. Since 2005, New Zealand has had the backing of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which provides a legal basis (and a requirement) for tobacco control action such as plain packs.

 A 53-month delay

Australia took 18 months to pass their plain packs law, France 20 months, Ireland 22 months, the UK 35 months, and New Zealand 53 months.

In the end, the tobacco industry or their proxy countries did not sue New Zealand. Instead, they used the mere threat of legal action to help delay plain packs in New Zealand. Tobacco control advocates argue that if the government had been serious about saving lives and helping smokers quit, they would have started and finished the plain packs' legislation much earlier. The 53 months taken is in contrast to previous major New Zealand tobacco control legislation, which took less than a year (1990) or less than three years (2001-2003).

Besides the ability of a multinational to form government policy, the ultimate significance of delaying plain packs in New Zealand or elsewhere is the tremendous human cost. The political delays allow the tobacco industry more time to recruit new young smokers to consume a product that kills over half of all long-time users. Former Australian Health Minister Nicola Roxon said it best, “We are killing people by not acting.”

Such industry tactics are not limited to plain packs and are the tip of the iceberg in their fight to continue to profit from tobacco and nicotine. In the USA, the industry in 2006 was found by Judge Kessler to have systematically lied to the public for 50 years:

‘Defendants lied, misrepresented and deceived the American public, including smokers and the young people they avidly sought as ‘replacement’ smokers, about the devastating health effects of smoking and environmental tobacco smoke.’

Because of the global nature of the major tobacco companies, this statement can apply across many countries. Industry tactics have been summarised as denial, deceit and delay.

The industry uses threats, lies, distortions and the suborning of officials and politicians. This has been a clear pattern for over sixty years, in every country on the globe, and the effects are worse in countries less able to withstand such tactics. For instance, in 2016 the industry stopped tobacco tax increases in Malaysia and Indonesia, and in Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia, pictorial health warnings for tobacco were either stopped or delayed.

Because of the growing ability of multinationals to sue the New Zealand government, the health of New Zealanders may be increasingly vulnerable to similar threats. We need to constantly ask questions such as ‘is the current Government’s lack of action on sugar taxes because of such threats?’

Such issues are becoming even more difficult with new trade agreements having been just concluded or in the process of negotiation, which makes it difficult for Government to regulate for health actions.


 

This opinion piece is based on our recent article ‘Regulatory Chills: Tobacco industry legal threats and the politics of tobacco standardized packaging in New Zealand’ which was published in the New Zealand Medical Journal in April this year.

Dr Eric Crosbie, University of California, San Francisco

Associate Professor George Thomson, University of Otago, Wellington

Latest

Why people are ditching Wellington for Wairarapa
91949 2018-06-19 00:00:00Z Life in NZ

Why people are ditching Wellington for Wairarapa

by Mike White

Even Featherston, a place once known for drugs and evil murders, is being favoured by Wellington workers and artists.

Read more
Relax at Ambler, a new contemporary cafe-bistro in Point Chev
92505 2018-06-18 09:49:29Z Auckland Eats

Relax at Ambler, a new contemporary cafe-bistro in…

by Kate Milliken

Julien Albe and Matthieu Gosset's new venture Ambler has been a long time coming.

Read more
'Stay safe': The problem with telling women how not to be attacked by a man
92495 2018-06-18 07:09:25Z Social issues

'Stay safe': The problem with telling women how no…

by Bianca Fileborn

The rape and murder of a young comedian in Melbourne this week sparked outrage - fuelled by police telling women to "stay safe".

Read more
Jacinda Ardern's challenging last full week as Prime Minister
92490 2018-06-18 06:10:16Z Politics

Jacinda Ardern's challenging last full week as Pri…

by Jane Patterson

If Jacinda Ardern was hoping for an easy slide into maternity leave, her main coalition partner wasn't helping her.

Read more
Why Melania Trump is the reluctant First Lady
92500 2018-06-18 00:00:00Z World

Why Melania Trump is the reluctant First Lady

by Joanne Black

Even before her recent “disappearance”, US First Lady Melania Trump’s commitment to the role was publicly doubted.

Read more
How to know if you have coeliac disease
92118 2018-06-18 00:00:00Z Health

How to know if you have coeliac disease

by The Listener

Coeliac NZ suggests you consider getting tested if you have some or all of the following symptoms of coeliac disease.

Read more
For coeliac disease sufferers, there's hope of treatment on the horizon
92091 2018-06-18 00:00:00Z Nutrition

For coeliac disease sufferers, there's hope of tre…

by Nicky Pellegrino

As many as 100,000 New Zealanders, many of them undiagnosed, are afflicted by coeliac disease.

Read more
As Jacinda Ardern takes her baby exit - the show goes on
92466 2018-06-17 00:00:00Z Politics

As Jacinda Ardern takes her baby exit - the show g…

by Graham Adams

The PM can happily go off on maternity leave knowing there is a cast of colourful and capable people to fill the gap — most notably Winston Peters.

Read more