The wall-to-wall coverage of Harry and Meghan is our faultby Bill Ralston
Help us find and write the stories Kiwis need to read
You could detonate an atomic bomb as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle walk down the aisle and no one would notice.
Every now and then, the world goes mad over royalty and the latest Windsor engagement has lit the fuse for another explosion of media hyperbole.
The red-haired and mischievous Harry has long been reporters’ favourite member of the royals and the American actress Meghan Markle is not exactly a woman of homely appearance, so I am expecting the tabloids to go big on the story until they reach an orgasmic crescendo the day of the wedding.
It is our fault, because the tabloids know we lap it up. In 1981, I did a story for the late TV news bulletin on an ugly and violent clash between anti-apartheid protesters and police outside Parliament. I ran home to bask in the glow of my flatmates’ appreciation of my splendid reportage, only to find them spellbound by live coverage of the wedding of the Prince of Wales and Lady Diana Spencer. None of them saw my tale of the carnage in Molesworth St. The were not interested in anything but what was happening in St Paul’s Cathedral.
It will be the same when Harry and Meghan tie the knot. You could detonate an atomic bomb on Lambton Quay as they walk down the aisle and no one would notice.
That a divorcée of African-American heritage can be engaged to the fifth in line to the British throne suggests that attitudes have moved on a bit since 1936, when Edward VIII abdicated so he could marry twice-divorced Wallis Simpson. That their BBC interviewer for the big announcement was a Muslim mother of three indicates an even broader shift in society over the past couple of generations.
Harry reportedly proposed while the couple cooked a chook in his Kensington Palace apartment, where presumably they have been living together.
Importantly, Meghan gets on well with the Queen’s notoriously yappy, nippy corgis: they habitually bark at Harry, but not at her.
The couple, tipped to become the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, will have their own pair of rescue dogs that look like mongrels. That is just the first piece of Harry-and-Meghan trivia that will trickle out over the next few months.
Once the media exhausts the almost unlimited fund of stories about them, including nail-biting speculation about whether she will be a runaway bride, it will regurgitate sad Charles and Diana features before then churning out a few more sagas about the perils of Prince William and Kate.
It may be time to stop following the news until at least the next European spring. I will go back to looking for more sightings of the aquatic Harry and Meghan.
This article was first published in the December 9, 2017 issue of the New Zealand Listener.
Julien Albe and Matthieu Gosset's new venture Ambler has been a long time coming.Read more
The rape and murder of a young comedian in Melbourne this week sparked outrage - fuelled by police telling women to "stay safe".Read more
If Jacinda Ardern was hoping for an easy slide into maternity leave, her main coalition partner wasn't helping her.Read more
As many as 100,000 New Zealanders, many of them undiagnosed, are afflicted by coeliac disease.Read more
The PM can happily go off on maternity leave knowing there is a cast of colourful and capable people to fill the gap — most notably Winston Peters.Read more
This year marks a century since a flu pandemic killed 9000 NZers. Three more such plagues have swept the world since then – and another is inevitable.Read more