IRD asks staff to undergo psychometric tests as part of restructure processby Adriana Weber
Staff have been told 30 percent of IRD's workforce will go by 2021 and the Public Service Association (PSA) union is fighting the use of psychometric testing in the restructure.
PSA has filed papers with the Employment Court.
It said about 800 staff reapplying for jobs were initially told they have to do psychometric tests, along with an interview and self assessments, as part of the process.
IRD has since sent out an email telling staff they can now choose whether to complete the psychometric assessments, but if they do not sit the tests, it could affect their chances of getting a job.
"The decision will [then] be based mainly on your interview, and will not include the broader picture that can be provided through the psychometric assessments.
"Given that the new roles include new skills and capabilities, this may mean that we have insufficient information that we can rely on to be satisfied of your capability to perform these new roles," the letter said.
The union's national secretary, Erin Polaczuk, said the tests were completely irrelevant, and could be used as a means to unfairly get rid of people.
"The tests themselves are incredibly subjective. And when it comes to a person's personality there is no right or wrong. We also don't think it's ethical to force somebody to undertake a test that is, essentially, a psychiatric test," she said.
"We don't know how much weight they're going to be giving these tests, and they're testing a person's personality, so if you don't want someone who asks difficult questions, or isn't compliant, maybe you would use it to get rid of particular people."
Psychometric tests are used by employers to assess people's intelligence and personality, and usually involve situational and multiple choice type questions.
Some tests try to give an insight into a person's personality type by asking how strongly they agree with statements, or by offering up hypothetical scenarios and asking respondents to prioritise them.
Ms Polaczuk said the were unnecessary.
"Many of these staff have worked with this agency for years and have undergone performance reviews and assessments over that time. Surely the details that are gained through those types of discussions and their relationships with their managers means more than this pseudo-scientific testing."
Jane Bryson, an associate professor at Victoria University's School of Management, agreed the tests should not be necessary for people already in an organisation, who management would already have ample information about.
But she said they could be a useful tool in some situations.
"For particular types of occupations a personality questionnaire may be useful.
"For instance things like sales-type jobs, some management jobs, maybe jobs where you require staff to have some good ability to cope with stress in the job."
However, Barbara Buckett, an employment law specialist with over 35 years' experience, said using them in this context was "legally dubious".
She said the tests could potentially breach the State Sector Act, which states employers must choose the most suitable candidate.
If the tests did not relate to suitability for the role, that would potentially be a breach the law, she said.
"They're dubious legally, and I think they're offensive to fair and open and transparent processes. And certainly in terms of selection processes, they're also questionable as to whether under the State Sector Act they are able to sort out the best-suited candidate for the position, which is the legal requirement," she said.
"The PSA are right to have picked this up. I think it's an issue that should be addressed. I think it's an inappropriate use of a process, and in today's world... there's issues of good faith and openness. I think they are a problem."
The PSA is waiting to find out when the case will be heard.
This article was originally published by RNZ.
Perhaps Labour's PR outfit should next turn their talents to Washington, where Donald Trump is turning the White House into a cesspit.Read more
Some experts are calling for confidentiality agreements in sexual harassment cases to be scrapped as the #MeToo movement gathers pace.Read more
The Employment Relations Act is very clear about what constitutes sexual harassment in New Zealand.Read more
Few people could be better suited than Louise Nicholson to deal with a brain tumour diagnosis.Read more
A twilight tour in Waipoua Forest highlights the majesty, and the fragility, of our mighty kauri.Read more
It's often said that diet is the most important cause of gout, but for most people changing it won't lower uric acid levels enough to stop the pain.Read more